Women’s March: 100,000 Coloradans Stage Peaceful Rally in Civic Center Park
Denver, Jan. 21 – A vast throng of Denverites, predominantly women, demonstrated peacefully in the heart of the city last Saturday, in response to the presidential inauguration of Donald J. Trump and his controversial policies.
The Women’s March in the Mile High City was one of 673 sister marches that took place worldwide, inspired by the Women’s March on Washington – the march that started the movement.
With one in 100 citizens taking part – circa 3 million people – some analysts have touted this event as the largest day of protest in US history.
Exceeding organizer’s expected turnout of 40,000 participants, the overall tone of the march and the assembly at Civic Center Park was peaceful and subdued.
A brisk day, with many picketers wearing conspicuous ‘pink hats’, the temperature began in the low 40’s that morning, warming up to near 50 by mid-afternoon.
While women’s issues stood at the forefront, indeed the diverse crowd reflected the march’s inclusive message, allowing people to voice a variety of concerns.
Many came with homemade signs, some humorous, but most pertaining to the state of social justice, human rights, and equality, particularly – but not exclusively – in American society.
According to its website www.MarchonColorado.org the March had a distinct three-fold mission:
1) Protecting women’s biological and reproductive health.
2) Supporting and protecting the diverse communities of America and condemning hateful and rhetoric actions.
3) Treating all people regardless of gender, gender identity, race, disability, religion, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status, equally and equitably.
Co-organizer Cheetah McClellan, a math interventionist at Colfax Elementary School knew she had to do something when her 16-year-old daughter, who came out as a lesbian three years ago, revealed her innermost fears.
“For her, the election was terrifying – hearing all the hateful rhetoric going around,” said McClellan.
Learning about the planned Women’s March on Washington, McClellan, together with Karen Hinkel, a local estate agent, and Jessica Rogers, a book curator, set out to organize their own march in Denver.
Creating a Facebook page for the event, McClellan sent it to some friends and posted it on Pantsuit Nation – a hashtag on Facebook and Twitter for Hillary Clinton supporters. 800 people signed up the following day.
The trio quickly went to work securing city permits, ordering port-a-potties, lining up speakers and performers, all the while fundraising through t-shirt and button sales.
“Yes, it’s organized by women, put on by women, all our performers and speakers are women, but we’re just the sponsors. It’s for everyone,” explained McClellan.
An array of local dignitaries also came to convey their solidarity, including Mayor Michael Hancock, Speaker of the Colorado House Cristina Duran, Rep. Joe Salazar, Rep. Leslie Herod, and many others.
While thousands of people from every walk of life congregated for a common purpose that day, there were no major incidents reported, making it the largest peaceful gathering since last year’s victory rally after the Broncos won the Superbowl.
Ginger Hill • Feb 6, 2017 at 5:55 pm
Thank you for your article Rashid. I think it was well written but only presents one side of the story.
The march organizers in Washington DC did not allow women who were pro-life to participate, thus alienating many women who may or may not have voted for Donald Trump.
It seems like the protest was mainly organized as an event against the new President, being held the day after his inauguration.
Reproductive rights that include the killing of the unborn are abhorrent to many women as these babies never get a chance to live but are killed before they are born.
This is one reason many women voted for Donald Trump.
Scott Bright • Feb 7, 2017 at 12:05 am
You’re right about the exclusion of the pro-life women, but there have been several pro-life rallies and protests alongside the Women’s March.
Monica Fuglei • Feb 7, 2017 at 8:10 am
@Scott Bright,
I believe, actually, that the March in DC allowed everyone who wanted to participate to March. What they did not allow was sponsorship from groups whose beliefs were in direct conflict with the March’s platform.
In other words, Pro-Life marchers were allowed to March, but the group did not accept sponsorship from pro-Life groups. It’s an important distinction, I think, that was lost on many.
Students for Life marched in the March, carrying a huge banner and airing their experience on Facebook Live.
Scott Bright • Feb 7, 2017 at 1:15 pm
@Monica Fuglei, Thank you for that! I knew I was missing something, because I was sure I witnessed quite a few Pro-life individuals in the crowds both in D.C. and Denver.